
As an educator, my profession revolves around pushing, challenging, and developing the minds of students in my classes. As an avid reader, the same principles are applied to my own professional development. Thus, I am embedded in the process of critical thinking at every turn. And now, pursuing a PhD, I am further challenged to critically discuss critical thinking. The PhD program will help satisfy my craving to continually learn and no one will accuse me of "over thinking."
Yet, critical thinking involves a lot of work, which so many are hesitant to incorporate into the everyday lives. Why? Well, why should the "masses" learn to think for themselves when so much information is readily available from the Internet or is "spoon fed" to them from other media sources. Websites such as Wikipedia, disguised as an unbiased and educational forum, fulfills a need for quick and easily digestible information. People think what they are told to think, many believing that I read it in the newspaper" or "I heard it on television so "it" must be true. I am not advocating banning media avenues. However, with using technology comes a responsibility to develop an understanding of its flaws as well as advantages.

(Images courtesy of http://images.google.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment